The current deck area on level 3 is an incomplete mess.

Timber deck eyesaw has been a waste of money

In 2019 four trees in our level 3 recreational area were proving problematic.

The trees had been planted in a very large purpose-made concrete planter box/garden bed located forward of the indoor pool. However, they had grown too large and for structural and safety reasons, had to be removed. Shrubs in the garden bed, like those planted elsewhere on the pool deck, were also removed.

This left behind a large planter box full of soil.

All that was ever needed was to top up the soil and replant shrubs – in keeping with the original ‘approved landscaping plans’ designed to complement the otherwise mostly tiled area. A timber deck was the last thing ever needed on the pool deck.

However, it’s what we got. The timber deck was inappropriately installed on top of an unstable garden bed at a cost of around $30,000. This was despite there being an abundance of space across the pool deck for more deck chairs and lounges if required.

Now, just four years later, the entire timber structure has been removed and is being replaced by, surprise, surprise, yet another timber deck – the cost of which has not been disclosed.

The original shady garden area before the pool deck.
The original shady garden area before the pool deck. The beautiful trees are long gone.

The committee says more than 10 cubic meters of soil were removed from the planter box and the drainage wastes cleaned. Only time will tell whether water seeping through the deck will fully drain or pond below in the planter boxes, smell and attract mosquitoes etc.

Pool deck after the installation
The pool deck after its installation.
The recreational area from above with the pool deck
The recreational area still with an immaculately kept garden and previous timber deck from above.
The deck area before recent renovations
The deck area before recent renovations.

There’s also the obvious safety hazard posed by the absence of a balustrade. People unfamiliar with the area could tumble from the upper paved level onto the timber deck below. Will this be addressed this time around?

The photos put into perspective what was once a beautiful, gardened area. The abundant shade has disappeared, and we’re left with an incomplete, very expensive mess.

Anger Over View Tax

How the nasty council ‘view tax’ works

The Gold Coast City Council builds and maintains the city’s infrastructure, including roads, parks, traffic signals, libraries, community centres, etc. To pay for this, it charges property owners general rates. This used to be a fairly simple charge assessed as a “rate” in the dollar based on the value of a property.

Interview with a Southport Central resident, July 29, 2024

The council has claimed that it has set a general rate of just 4.4 per cent. That, however, is very misleading as it is just the average across the whole city. In practice, the council has levied an additional view tax on all apartments in the Gold Coast resulting in an up to 50 percent increase in rates.

The new tax mirrors a “sunshine” tax first levied in England in 1696. It taxed property owners on the number of windows on the theory that the more windows, the wealthier the owner. It was repealed more than 170 years ago. The Gold Coast City Council’s version is that the higher your floor, the wealthier you are.

It goes like this: The higher the floor, the better the view; the better the view, the more valuable your apartment; the wealthier you are; the wealthier you are, the more you can afford to pay.

Southport Central resident Chris Griffith and Laura Bos, the general manager of the Strata Community Association Queensland, discuss the ‘view tax’ on Seven Sunrise, Sept 4, 2024.

The council says this is a fairer and more equitable way to set rates. But only for rating apartments. What do you think??? It affects every apartment owner, whether an investor, a retiree on a fixed income, an ordinary working person, a single mother, etc.

We all know this formula is fatally flawed and without any logical basis. No two views are equal. Many lower floors in some buildings can have a different and often better outlook than some higher floors that look into an adjoining building metres away.

Multi-million homes have very valuable views across canals as do mansions with absolute beach frontage and ocean views. They do not suffer a view tax.

The council acknowledges that it is far less expensive to maintain infrastructure for apartment owners than for low density suburban areas. Yet it singles us out to grossly
subsidise those suburban areas.

You receive higher rates depending on your floor

It is up to owners to protest this anachronistic, unfair and discriminatory view tax. Many of us have already written to our local councillor and our Member of Parliament.

We have also written to the state Minister for Local Government responsible for the legislation that lets the council impose this tax, and importantly, given the impending state election, the Shadow Minister for Local Government.

All owners need to write to ALL of these representatives telling them what we think of this and demanding the repeal of this tax.

Click here to protest to the council.

Email Ms Meaghan Scanlon, Minister for Local Government, Queensland 4000, housing@ministerial.qld.gov.au.

There’s also Ms Ann Leahy, Shadow Minister for Local Government, Queensland 4000, warrego@parliament.qld.gov.au.

Anger Over View Tax
Anger Over View Tax

Tell them that higher floors don’t equal an ability to pay up to 50% more in rates than a property owner in the suburbs or a multi-millionaire living on a canal.

Do it now!